<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Addition To The M-44</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mysks.wordpress.com/2009/06/08/new-addition-to-the-m-44/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mysks.wordpress.com/2009/06/08/new-addition-to-the-m-44/</link>
	<description>an sks rifle weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:00:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bibic682</title>
		<link>http://mysks.wordpress.com/2009/06/08/new-addition-to-the-m-44/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>bibic682</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 09:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysks.wordpress.com/?p=108#comment-83</guid>
		<description>It seems pretty stable , but I haven&#039;t field tested it yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems pretty stable , but I haven&#8217;t field tested it yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ</title>
		<link>http://mysks.wordpress.com/2009/06/08/new-addition-to-the-m-44/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 02:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysks.wordpress.com/?p=108#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Good luck with the mount. Thats a lot of recoil is that the only attachment point. I take it you just removed the rear sights and used the pins to fit in the mount?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck with the mount. Thats a lot of recoil is that the only attachment point. I take it you just removed the rear sights and used the pins to fit in the mount?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bibic682</title>
		<link>http://mysks.wordpress.com/2009/06/08/new-addition-to-the-m-44/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>bibic682</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 10:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysks.wordpress.com/?p=108#comment-76</guid>
		<description>My package doesn&#039;t show a brand of mount. It is pretty common on the net. It replaces the sight elevation piece. It costs around $12. Very easy to install. It seems to very stable, but I have not tested it out at the range yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My package doesn&#8217;t show a brand of mount. It is pretty common on the net. It replaces the sight elevation piece. It costs around $12. Very easy to install. It seems to very stable, but I have not tested it out at the range yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Brasky</title>
		<link>http://mysks.wordpress.com/2009/06/08/new-addition-to-the-m-44/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Brasky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 22:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysks.wordpress.com/?p=108#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Which brand of scout mount did you use?  I&#039;ve been looking into doing this, but do not want to spent $75 for the mount.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which brand of scout mount did you use?  I&#8217;ve been looking into doing this, but do not want to spent $75 for the mount.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOJO</title>
		<link>http://mysks.wordpress.com/2009/06/08/new-addition-to-the-m-44/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>JOJO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysks.wordpress.com/?p=108#comment-73</guid>
		<description>HAY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bibic682</title>
		<link>http://mysks.wordpress.com/2009/06/08/new-addition-to-the-m-44/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>bibic682</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 11:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysks.wordpress.com/?p=108#comment-72</guid>
		<description>It is a pad made for the m-44 stock. I can&#039;t recall the brand. But a lot of sites sell it. It seems to be very good quality and fits well. It replaces the metal butt plate. Cost was around $12.00.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a pad made for the m-44 stock. I can&#8217;t recall the brand. But a lot of sites sell it. It seems to be very good quality and fits well. It replaces the metal butt plate. Cost was around $12.00.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith &#34;Tan&#34; Brown</title>
		<link>http://mysks.wordpress.com/2009/06/08/new-addition-to-the-m-44/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith &#34;Tan&#34; Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysks.wordpress.com/?p=108#comment-71</guid>
		<description>I like the sight you put on that. I&#039;m a big fan of a &quot;scout&quot; setup because there&#039;s no issues with eye relief and you can quickly shoulder it with fast target acquisition.

Is that a Limbsaver recoil pad? Looks good on it. Nice wood as well. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the sight you put on that. I&#8217;m a big fan of a &#8220;scout&#8221; setup because there&#8217;s no issues with eye relief and you can quickly shoulder it with fast target acquisition.</p>
<p>Is that a Limbsaver recoil pad? Looks good on it. Nice wood as well. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex.</title>
		<link>http://mysks.wordpress.com/2009/06/08/new-addition-to-the-m-44/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>alex.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysks.wordpress.com/?p=108#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Cool!  I have a M-38 and it is a great little, but hard hitting, carbine.  I may have to put a modern sight on it. Funny, but people don&#039;t snort when a red dot or laser is mounted on a double action revolver, though that technology is contemporaneous to that of the Mosin.  Wonder why that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool!  I have a M-38 and it is a great little, but hard hitting, carbine.  I may have to put a modern sight on it. Funny, but people don&#8217;t snort when a red dot or laser is mounted on a double action revolver, though that technology is contemporaneous to that of the Mosin.  Wonder why that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle &#187; Gun Porn</title>
		<link>http://mysks.wordpress.com/2009/06/08/new-addition-to-the-m-44/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle &#187; Gun Porn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mysks.wordpress.com/?p=108#comment-60</guid>
		<description>[...] Mosin Nagant with red dot. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mosin Nagant with red dot. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
